The Week That Was in 103

This week in 103, we continued our study of the Roman Republic. We began with what Roman laws tell us about their society and ended with Julius Caesar and the breakdown of checks and balances. Along the way, students read, sketched, discussed, ranked, and created. Some lessons took longer than I expected. Other days, we accomplished more than I had planned.

Here is how the week came together.

Monday – What Did the Romans Value?

On Monday, we began with a Fast and Curious using Gimkit to review the Roman Republic. From there, we moved into the Twelve Tables and Roman laws. Our focus for the lesson was, “Based on the Twelve Tables, what did the Romans value?”

Students started with a loosely translated version of the Twelve Tables and some basic questions. This part was almost like a scavenger hunt. Students had to find the answer and cite the table it came from. I wanted them getting familiar with the laws and practicing finding evidence before answering our larger question.

Next, we went to Scriblit, where students used evidence from the tables to explain what the Romans valued. This required them to think about what the laws protected and what the punishments suggested was important to Roman society.

The Twelve Tables questions took longer than I anticipated. The Scriblit response did too. Finding a law is one thing. Explaining what that law tells us about a society takes a little more time.

For classes with time remaining, I had three “dumb criminal” cases ready. These were real-life cases, and students had to use their knowledge of Roman law to explain how the criminal would have been charged and punished in ancient Rome. They also had to cite the table that supported their answer.

I like this kind of application because it gives students another reason to return to the reading. They have to figure out which law applies and explain how they would use it in a different situation.

Tuesday – Cincinnatus and Civic Duty

Tuesday’s lesson was fairly simple. We focused on civic duty and the story of Cincinnatus. I wanted students thinking about what it means to serve your community and how someone’s actions can show that responsibility.

We began with a Frayer for civic duty. I like using a Frayer before a reading because it gives students a chance to work through a concept they will need to understand the story. Examples are especially helpful with something like civic duty. Students need to think about what it looks like when someone takes responsibility for helping their community.

After the Frayer, we read about Cincinnatus. His story centers on accepting power during an emergency and then giving it up when the job was finished. This gave us a specific example of civic duty to consider.

Students mapped out the reading with a Somebody-Wanted-But-So-Then Sketch and Tell. They had to identify the important parts of the story, put them into a summary, and create a picture to go with it. I like this format because it gives students a structure for organizing a story without asking them to retell every detail.

We then returned to the same reading for an Archetype Four Square. Students had to decide which archetype best fit Cincinnatus and explain their choice using his actions from the story. They also had to relate him to someone else who shared those characteristics.

This is the part I like about using archetypes. Students have to make a choice and explain it. Calling someone a hero is easy. Explaining which actions make that person a hero, and connecting those actions to another person or character, requires more thought.

The sequence gave us three ways to work with the same idea. The Frayer introduced civic duty, the Sketch and Tell helped students organize Cincinnatus’s story, and the Archetype Four Square asked them to think more closely about his character.

It also gave us someone to return to later in the week. Cincinnatus gave up power when his job was finished. That decision would be useful to remember when we got to Julius Caesar.

Wednesday – The Punic Wars in 30 Minutes

Wednesday was a 30-minute class, so I needed a sequence that would get students into the Punic Wars and give them time to do something with what they learned. We used a Wicked Hydra, Sketch and Tell-O, and a Tier List.

We began with an image and three minutes to ask questions. I did not introduce the Punic Wars or explain what students were looking at. I put them into groups and told them to ask questions.

The image gave them plenty to work with. Students asked why people were riding elephants, why buildings were on fire, what body of water they were looking at, and why some people appeared larger than others.

I like starting this way because students can participate before they know the content. They can look closely, notice something unusual, and ask about it. The elephants certainly helped.

Sketch and Tell-O

Next, students worked through three chunked readings, one for each Punic War. We paired the readings with a Sketch and Tell-O, spending about 15–20 minutes reading, sketching, sharing, and explaining.

Students sketched two important ideas from each war and described their sketches in the boxes underneath. At the end, they answered the larger question: “How did the Punic Wars increase Rome’s power?”

Splitting the reading into three sections helped keep the wars organized. Students could work through one war at a time while building toward an explanation of how all three changed Rome.

I also like having students sketch what they read. They have to decide which ideas are important and figure out how to represent them. The written explanation gives them a chance to make the meaning of the drawing clear. Artistic ability is not what I am looking for here. I want to see what students understood from the reading.

Tier List – Which War Mattered Most?

We finished with a Tier List. Students ranked the three Punic Wars based on their significance to Rome becoming a Mediterranean power. They placed the wars in S, A, and B tiers and used evidence from the readings to explain their choices.

This led to some great discussions and debate. Students had the same three wars and the same readings, but they still had to decide what counted as the strongest reason for placing one war above another.

I like a Tier List for this kind of task because it gives students a decision to make. They cannot put everything at the top. They have to compare the wars, return to the information, and explain why one contributed more than another.

For a 30-minute class, this sequence gave us a lot to work with. Students began by asking questions about an unfamiliar image, organized information through sketches and explanations, and finished by making an argument about Rome’s growing power.

Thursday – Why Was the Republic Falling Apart?

Thursday was one of those days where we accomplished more than I expected. We worked through the problems facing the Roman Republic, collected notes from whiteboards, and used the Gracchus brothers for another Archetype Four Square. We even had about 10 minutes left for a Gimkit review.

After Wednesday’s lesson on the Punic Wars, I wanted students thinking about what happened as Rome grew. Rome was becoming more powerful, but what did that mean for the people living there?

Iron Chef Whiteboards

We began with an Iron Chef on whiteboards. I handed out four different readings about reasons for the Republic’s decline. Students had two minutes to read and eight minutes to create a board with four important facts, a title, a picture, and a 10-word summary.

I like using whiteboards for this because students have to work together and make decisions fairly quickly. They need to decide which facts matter, how to illustrate the topic, and how to summarize it in exactly 10 words. That last part can take some negotiating.

The picture also gives students another way to explain the reading. One board about unequal wealth and land showed a struggling farmer beside a much larger farm. The drawing helped communicate the problem students were describing in their facts.

A Frayer and a Walk Around the Room

After completing the boards, students spent about eight to 10 minutes walking around and collecting information on a Frayer-style organizer. Each section gave them a place to record facts about one of the problems facing the Republic.

I have used the Frayer this way before. The four boxes make it easy to organize information from different topics, and students leave with notes from all four readings.

The whiteboards also had a purpose beyond the group that created them. Other students needed to read them and learn from them. Choosing clear facts and creating a useful picture mattered because classmates were using that work to build their own understanding.

Which Problem Would Affect People Most?

Once students had collected their notes, we debriefed with a question: “Which of these problems would affect people the most?”

I wanted students to look back at the information and think about what these problems meant for someone living in Rome. This gave us a transition into the Gracchus brothers. Students had some background on the problems before reading about two people who tried to address them.

Students read about the brothers and completed an Archetype Four Square. They chose an archetype, supported it with evidence, created a visual, and connected the brothers to another person or character. We then shared their ideas.

We had used this same format with Cincinnatus on Tuesday. I like returning to a familiar structure because students already know what to do with the boxes. They can spend more time thinking about the people in the reading and explaining their choices.

One student connected the Gracchus brothers to Cincinnatus because of their efforts to help others. Students were returning to an earlier reading and using it to make sense of someone new.

We finished with Gimkit to review. After Monday’s lesson took longer than I anticipated, it was nice to have a day where the timing worked out and we had room to revisit earlier content.

Friday – Checks and Balances and a Julius Caesar Costume

Friday was a continuation of our work on the decline of the Roman Republic. It was also the day before Halloween, so I wanted to work in something creative while keeping us moving forward with the content.

We began with a Frayer for checks and balances. I compared the concept to a game of rock, paper, scissors. Each choice can beat another choice, but each can also be beaten. There is no single choice that wins every time.

This gave students a starting point for thinking about how different parts of a government can limit one another’s power. Students paraphrased a definition and came up with examples and nonexamples. I like including nonexamples because students have to think about what would happen if those limits were missing or stopped working.

From there, we transitioned to Julius Caesar. I asked students to think about how Caesar broke down checks and balances as we worked through the reading.

We also connected this to Thursday’s lesson. One of the problems students had studied was generals gaining too much power. Now we had a specific person to help us follow that problem and see how it contributed to the Republic’s decline.

Cyber Sandwich with a Halloween Ending

We used a Cyber Sandwich to read about Julius Caesar. Students had categories to guide their note-taking, and I gave them 10 minutes to read and collect information.

I like giving students categories when there are several things I want them paying attention to in a reading. It gives their notes some organization and helps them find information they can use in the discussion afterward.

After the 10 minutes, students shared and discussed their notes with a partner. This gave them a chance to compare what they had written, explain their ideas, and see what they might have missed.

Usually, we would finish the Cyber Sandwich with a written summary. For this lesson, I changed the final task to connect it to Halloween. Students had to design a Julius Caesar costume with accessories related to his life and actions.

The accessories gave students a reason to return to their notes. They had to decide which details about Caesar were important enough to include and figure out how to represent them as part of a costume.

I like making changes like this to a familiar activity. The reading, note-taking, and discussion still gave students the information they needed, but the final task offered a different way to use it. It was a fun, creative way to finish our work for the week and fit the day before Halloween.

Lessons for the Week

Tuesday – Cincinnatus Rack and Stack, Reading

Wednesday – Punic Wars Rack and Stack, Reading

Thursday – Decline of the Roman Republic, All Readings

Friday – Caesar CyberSandwich, Reading

The Week That Was in 103

Have you ever finished a lesson thinking students understood something only to come back the next day and wonder what happened? That was my Wednesday. Tuesday’s scores looked good. Students had read about the Roman Republic, taken notes, sketched, and explained how the government worked. However, a few changes to the wording of questions and answer choices threw things off. I had a whole lesson planned for Wednesday. That lesson needed to wait.

This week was a short one in 7th grade social studies. We were off Monday and had Grandparents Day on Friday, leaving three days to work with the Roman Republic. During those three days, we used some familiar EduProtocols, revisited content that needed another look, and compared Rome’s government to Athenian democracy.

Tuesday

I like simple. Simple, especially with something like government in the Roman Republic. Consuls, senators, assemblies, patricians, and plebeians can become a lot of words pretty quickly. I wanted students to understand how these pieces worked together, who had power, and how that power was limited. To do this, I put together a simple rack and stack of activities.

Fast & Curious

We began with a Fast & Curious Gimkit. The three class averages were 64%, 55%, and 58%. This gave us a starting point and helped me see what needed attention before students began working with the reading.

Frayer

From there, we spent about five minutes on explicit instruction and a Frayer for the word republic. Before getting into the different parts of Rome’s government, I wanted students to have a working understanding of the type of government we were studying. We worked through the definition, characteristics, examples, and nonexamples.

Alphaboxes

Next, students had eight minutes to read and take notes using Alphaboxes. After reading, they shared with a partner and then shared their most creative note. I like this part because students get to see how someone else organized the same information. They are working with the same reading, but their notes don’t have to look exactly alike.

Alphaboxes also gives students a reason to think about the words they are choosing. They have to connect information from the reading to a letter and create a note that makes sense. After sharing, they had another opportunity to add information or clarify something before moving on.

Sketch & Tell-O

Students then used their Alphaboxes to complete a Sketch & Tell-O. They had eight minutes to sketch, describe, and explain important information about the Roman Republic. The sketches included things like the two consuls, the Senate, assemblies, and the differences between patricians and plebeians. Along with the sketches, students explained how Rome divided political power and why some Romans had more influence than others.

We closed with another round of Fast & Curious. Class averages increased to 85%, 88%, and 67%. After seeing those scores and looking at their work, I felt pretty good about where we were.

Then came Wednesday.

Wednesday

Fast & Curious

We began with another Fast & Curious Gimkit. I had changed some of the republic-related questions, including some wording and answer choices. I expected a little adjustment. I did not expect the scores to drop as much as they did after one day.

It’s fascinating to me how a small change in wording can throw students off. They can answer a question one way, but ask about the same idea a little differently and suddenly it becomes difficult. Tuesday’s scores gave me one piece of information. Wednesday’s questions gave me another. I needed to pay attention to both.

I had a whole lesson planned, but I scrapped it. Students needed to learn about Rome’s republic differently before we moved on.

CyberSandwich

I put together a quick CyberSandwich using a reading that explained the government more clearly and approached the information a little differently. This time, students had three focused questions to guide their notes.

After reading and taking notes, students went to the whiteboards. Their task was to identify the top three pieces of information they would need to include in a summary. There was a lot they could include, but what did someone really need to know to understand the Roman Republic? That was the decision they had to make. From there, we went to Scriblit and students wrote their summaries.

This is what I love about EduProtocols. I already knew the structure, and students knew what to do with it. I could spend my time finding a clearer reading and focusing the task on what they needed. Looking at the data, realizing something needed to change, and putting together a different lesson didn’t require starting from scratch. I still wanted students to understand the same content. We just needed another way to get there.

Thursday

Condense and Compare

On Thursday, we brought Athenian democracy back into the conversation. Students had already studied Athens during our Ancient Greece unit, so this was an opportunity to connect that learning to the Roman Republic.

I was inspired by another post I had seen and put together a lesson I called Condense and Compare. Students began by writing 10-word summaries. Ten words doesn’t leave much room, which is the point. They had to decide what mattered most and how to communicate it clearly.

Next, students used the whiteboards to create Venn diagrams comparing Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic. They looked at how citizens participated, how leaders were selected, and who had access to political power. This brought us back to an important part of both governments: having citizens participate did not mean everyone could participate equally.

After comparing the governments, students went to Scriblit to respond to a question: Which government would you rather live under if you were a…?

I assigned a person for students to consider and changed that person between classes. This added something to the comparison. Choosing a government becomes a different question when students have to think about who they are within that society. A wealthy male citizen might have a different answer than someone excluded from political participation.

The goal was to use their comparison to explain a choice. Students needed to connect how the government worked to what that would mean for the person they had been assigned. Their summaries and Venn diagrams gave them information to work with when writing their responses. We finished with Gimkit.

A Short Week and a Change of Plans

We did not have social studies on Friday because of Grandparents Day, so Thursday wrapped up our week.

Wednesday was the part of this week that stuck with me. It would have been easy to look at Tuesday’s closing scores and move on. However, changing a few questions showed me something I needed to see. Students needed more work with the content, and I needed to teach it differently.

I like having a plan. I also like having familiar activities that make it possible to change that plan when needed. This week, a quick CyberSandwich and some time at the whiteboards became the lesson we needed.

Lessons for the week

Tuesday: Fast & Curious, Frayer, Alphaboxes, and Sketch & Tell-O
Wednesday: Fast & Curious and CyberSandwich
Thursday: Condense and Compare, writing in Scriblit, and Gimkit

The Week That Was in 103

This week in Room 103, my seventh graders began their study of Ancient Rome. I wanted to spend the first few days building some background knowledge about Rome’s geography, founding, and growth before getting into the Roman Republic and Empire. We had a little bit of everything this week, including some local Cincinnati history, a traditional map activity, and a few EduProtocol combinations that I hadn’t tried before.

One thing I appreciated about this week was the flexibility of the lessons. We had a regular schedule most days, but Wednesday was only 30 minutes. Rather than completely changing what I wanted students to learn, I was able to adjust the structure of the lesson and still accomplish quite a bit. I also walked away from the week with a few things to think about, particularly when it comes to students’ mapping skills and how much they can accomplish when the instructional routines are familiar.

Monday: Ancient Rome Is Hiding in Cincinnati

Wicked Hydra

We kicked off our Ancient Rome unit with a local connection to Cincinnati history. I displayed two pictures for a Wicked Hydra. The first was the statue of Cincinnatus located at Sawyer Point, and the second was the statue of the wolf with Romulus and Remus located in Eden Park. Students had four minutes to generate questions about the first picture before switching to the second picture and repeating the process. There wasn’t much direction beyond looking closely at the pictures and asking questions about what they noticed.

What surprised me was that none of my students knew these statues were located in Cincinnati. I wasn’t expecting them to know the history behind the statues, but I figured at least a few students would recognize them. That wasn’t the case. It ended up being a pretty good way to introduce the unit because we had two local landmarks that connected directly to what we were about to study. I also liked that students were generating questions before they had any real background knowledge about the people or events represented in the pictures.

Number Mania

After the Wicked Hydra, we moved into a Number Mania using a reading I created called Ancient Rome’s History Is Hiding in Cincinnati. The reading focused on the legend of Romulus and Remus, the founding of Rome, the establishment of the Roman Republic, and the story of Cincinnatus. It also explained the connection between Cincinnatus, George Washington, the Society of the Cincinnati, and how our city received its name.

Students were asked to identify four significant numbers from the reading. For each number, they had to explain what it represented, why it mattered to Roman history or Cincinnati, and include a visual. I like using Number Mania because it gives students some flexibility in what they identify as important while still requiring them to explain the significance of the information. In this case, it also helped us establish some of the basic chronology of Rome while continuing the local history connection from the beginning of class.

Fast & Curious

We ended Monday with two rounds of Fast & Curious using Gimkit to introduce our Ancient Rome vocabulary. Nothing particularly fancy here. I wanted students to begin seeing and working with some of the terms that would continue to appear throughout the unit. We’ll continue revisiting this vocabulary over the next several weeks.

Tuesday: A Traditional Map Day

Mapping Ancient Rome

Tuesday was a pretty straightforward day. I don’t typically spend an entire class having students label and color maps, but I needed a quieter day, and I figured it would be a good opportunity to introduce some of Rome’s basic geography. Students received a blank map of Europe and used several reference maps to identify and label the Tiber River, Rome, the Alps, the Apennines, the Mediterranean Sea, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Italian Peninsula. They also had to identify Rome’s location and territorial expansion in 753 BCE, 27 BCE, and 117 CE.

What stood out to me was how much difficulty some students had transferring information from the reference maps to their blank maps. They could often find a location on one map, but figuring out exactly where to place it on another map was a different story. The spacing, scale, and orientation seemed to create more problems than I anticipated. I found myself helping students with things that I probably assumed they already knew how to do.

I’m glad we spent time on this because it reminded me that some of these basic geographic skills need more attention. I don’t know that I want to dedicate more full class periods to mapping, but I am wondering if smaller mapping activities throughout a unit might be beneficial. Even five or ten minutes of practice here and there could help students become more comfortable using different maps and transferring information between them. It’s something I’m going to think about as we move through the rest of the year.

Fast & Curious

We finished Tuesday with another round of Fast & Curious using our Ancient Rome vocabulary on Gimkit. This gave students another opportunity to practice the terms we introduced on Monday before moving into some more content-heavy activities later in the week.

Wednesday: Geography and a 30-Minute EduProtocol Smash

Wednesday was one of our shortened 30-minute classes, so I wanted something that would keep students moving while still requiring them to think about the content. Our focus was on how geography contributed to the growth of Rome. I decided to combine Sketch & Tell, a Frayer-style organizer, and a Tier List into one lesson. I’ve used all of these structures before, but I wanted to see how they would work together in a shorter class period.

Sketch & Tell

I started by giving students short readings about different geographic features that influenced Rome’s development. These included the Tiber River, the Alps and Apennines, fertile farmland, and the Italian Peninsula and Mediterranean Sea. Students had two minutes to read about their assigned feature before finding some whiteboard space with their group. From there, they had five minutes to create a Sketch & Tell that included a title, three facts, and a picture.

The purpose was pretty simple. Each group needed to develop an understanding of one geographic feature and create something that would help their classmates learn about it. With only five minutes to work, students had to identify the information they thought was most important rather than trying to include everything from the reading. Once the whiteboards were finished, we were ready to move into the next part of the lesson.

Frayer + Tier List

This was the part of the lesson I was most interested in trying. I combined elements of a Frayer with a Tier List to have students evaluate the importance of Rome’s different geographic features. Students walked around the classroom, read the information on the whiteboards, and completed an organizer that required them to place each geographic feature into one of four categories: S for Essential, A for Very Important, B for Helpful, and C for Limited Importance.

For each feature, students had to identify two characteristics and explain why they placed it in that particular tier. They had about ten minutes to gather information, discuss their choices, and complete their rankings. What I liked about this combination was that students couldn’t simply copy facts from the whiteboards and move on. They had to use those facts to make a decision about how much each feature contributed to Rome’s growth. There wasn’t necessarily one perfect way to rank everything, so students had opportunities to discuss their reasoning and defend their choices.

I thought the combination worked pretty well, especially considering our limited time. The Sketch & Tell provided the information, while the Frayer and Tier List required students to do something with it. It also built directly on Tuesday’s mapping activity. Students had already located these features on a map, and now they were examining why those locations mattered to the development of Rome.

Fast & Curious

We finished Wednesday with two rounds of Fast & Curious using Gimkit. In 30 minutes, students had read about geographic features, created whiteboards, gathered information from their classmates, ranked the importance of those features, and practiced vocabulary. It was a lot to fit into a shortened class, but the familiar structures helped keep things moving without spending much time explaining directions.

Thursday: Building a Timeline of Ancient Rome

Thursday was another day of combining EduProtocols, although this time we had our regular 45-minute class. After spending the first part of the week learning about Rome’s founding and geography, I wanted students to develop a basic understanding of some of the major events in Roman history. Rather than having everyone read the same passage or complete a traditional timeline from a textbook, I decided to use an Iron Chef followed by a Sketch & Tell-O Timeline.

Fast & Curious

We started with a quick three-minute round of Fast & Curious on Gimkit. This time, the questions focused on the geography content from Wednesday. I wanted to revisit some of that information before shifting our attention to the major events in Rome’s history.

Iron Chef

For the Iron Chef, I created six short readings, each focused on an important date in Roman history. The dates were 753 BCE, 509 BCE, 146 BCE, 27 BCE, 117 CE, and 476 CE. Together, these events provided students with a basic overview of Rome’s legendary founding, the establishment of the Republic, its military expansion, the beginning of the Empire, its greatest territorial extent, and the fall of the Western Roman Empire.

Each group received one reading and had three minutes to read about its assigned event. Students then found space on the classroom whiteboards and had eight minutes to create a title, include the year, identify four important facts, and draw a picture. I wanted each group to create a quick visual summary that their classmates could use to learn about the event. Since students were responsible for different dates, we ended up with information about all six events displayed around the room.

Sketch & Tell-O Timeline

Once the Iron Chef whiteboards were completed, students received a Sketch & Tell-O Timeline. Their task was to walk around the classroom, read the information from each group, and place the six events in chronological order. For each event, they had to include the correct year, write a 10-word summary, and draw a picture that represented what happened.

One of my favorite parts of the lesson was listening to students discuss how to summarize each event in just ten words. It’s easy to copy a sentence from a whiteboard, but limiting students to ten words forced them to think about which information was actually important. I heard students discussing what details needed to be included, which words could be removed, and how to make their summaries accurately explain what happened. Those conversations were probably more valuable than the finished timelines themselves.

I also liked how similar the structure was to Wednesday’s geography lesson. Students started with a short reading, worked with their group to create something on a whiteboard, and then used information from their classmates to complete an individual task. On Wednesday, they were evaluating the importance of geographic features. On Thursday, they were organizing historical events chronologically and summarizing their significance. The overall structure was familiar, but the thinking required was different.

Final Thoughts

Overall, I thought this was a good start to our Ancient Rome unit. We covered some important background knowledge without spending the entire week taking notes or listening to me explain Roman history. Students were introduced to Rome’s founding, geography, territorial growth, and some of the major events that shaped its development. We also managed to connect the content to Cincinnati, which was something I hadn’t really taken advantage of in previous years.

Two things stood out to me this week. The first was Tuesday’s mapping activity and how much students struggled with transferring information between maps. It’s something I probably need to address more consistently rather than assuming students have already developed those skills. The second was how well Wednesday’s and Thursday’s lessons worked using similar structures. I didn’t need to reinvent everything for each lesson. I was able to use familiar EduProtocols, make a few adjustments, and have students engage with the content in different ways.

I think that’s one of the biggest benefits of using EduProtocols regularly. Students become familiar with the routines, which allows us to spend less time explaining how to complete an activity and more time actually working with the content. It also makes planning a little easier, especially when dealing with different class lengths and schedules.

Next week, we’ll continue building on this foundation as we move further into the history of Ancient Rome.

Lessons For The Week

Monday – Number Mania

Wednesday – Ancient Rome Readings, Frayer/Tier List Smash

Thursday – Sketch and Tell-O Timeline with Reading Link

The Week That Was in 103

Calling someone “great” is easy. Explaining why they deserve that title takes a little more work.

This week in 103, my 7th graders finished our Ancient Greece unit by examining Alexander the Great’s legacy. Monday through Wednesday, we focused on the question, “Should Alexander the Great be considered great?” Students built background knowledge, analyzed sources, and used evidence to make their own judgments.

On Thursday and Friday, students brought the entire unit together with a one-pager assessment. I’m not a traditional test kind of guy. I would rather kids make something with what they have learned.

Here is the layout of our week….

  • Monday: Background knowledge about Alexander’s accomplishments, challenges, and Hellenistic culture.
  • Tuesday: Sketch and Tell-O and Stake Your Claim with Documents B and C.
  • Wednesday: Sketch and Tell-O and Stake Your Claim with Documents D and E, followed by a Scriblit and Quick Write feedback.
  • Thursday: Begin the Ancient Greece one-pager during a shortened, 30-minute class.
  • Friday: Finish and submit the one-pager by the end of our 45-minute class.

Monday: Building Background Knowledge

Before students could decide whether Alexander deserved to be called great, they needed to understand what he accomplished and what problems he faced. We began with a Frayer on Hellenistic culture. Students worked through the definition, characteristics, examples, and a symbol to represent the idea. This gave us some vocabulary to use when discussing how Alexander connected different parts of the ancient world.

For our reading and partner work, students identified two accomplishments, two problems, and one way cultures connected. They compared notes with a partner, created a top-three list, and wrote about Alexander’s accomplishments and challenges. I like giving students a specific purpose when taking notes. Telling a 7th grader to “take notes” can mean just about anything. Giving them things to look for helps focus their reading and gives them something to discuss with a partner.

We also examined a map of Alexander’s conquests. Students considered how the map could support the claim that Alexander was great and what important information it left out. The map shows the reach of his conquests, but that alone does not answer our question. We needed to examine more evidence.

Tuesday and Wednesday: Sketch and Tell-O and Stake Your Claim

On Tuesday and Wednesday, students analyzed four sources about Alexander’s legacy, ranging from primary to secondary sources. We used Sketch and Tell-O with Stake Your Claim to break down the documents and build an answer to our question.

For each source, students sketched three important details and explained their sketches in writing. They then answered, “What does this document reveal about Alexander?” Their response had to use a detail from their sketches as evidence.

I like Sketch and Tell-O because students have to make decisions about what they read. They have to choose important details, represent them visually, and explain what those details mean. The “tell” part matters. I want to know what students understand about the detail they chose to draw.

After Documents B and C, students answered, “What would you call Alexander the Great?” We returned to that question after Documents D and E. As students encountered more information, they had a chance to reconsider their original claim.

For teachers looking to try this, the sequence is simple:

  1. Read a source.
  2. Sketch three important details.
  3. Explain each sketch.
  4. Make a claim using evidence from the source.
  5. Revisit the claim after reading additional sources.

I want students to understand that they can change their minds when they learn something new. They just need to explain how the evidence supports their thinking.

Wednesday: What Would You Call Alexander the Great?

After analyzing the sources, students pulled their thinking together with a Scriblit. The prompt was, “What would you call Alexander the Great?” Students had to support their answer with two pieces of evidence.

By this point, they had background information, sketches, explanations, and earlier claims to use. The writing grew out of the work we had already done. I like this question because students get to choose their answer. However, choosing a title for Alexander is only part of the task. They have to find evidence and explain why that evidence makes their title appropriate.

We used the Quick Write feature to get feedback on their responses. Students could get feedback while the sources and their thinking were still fresh. For teachers trying something similar, I would keep the prompt focused. One clear question with two pieces of evidence gives students a manageable writing task while still requiring them to make and support a historical judgment.

Thursday and Friday: Creating an Ancient Greece One-Pager

On Thursday, we began our Ancient Greece assessment. Students created a one-pager divided into four clearly labeled boxes. Each box focused on a major question from our unit:

  • Geography: How did geography shape life in Ancient Greece?
  • City-States: How were Athens and Sparta alike and different?
  • Alexander and a Connected World: How did Alexander the Great connect different parts of the ancient world?
  • Lasting Influence: Which Greek idea or achievement has had the greatest influence on our world today?

For each box, students wrote four to five complete sentences, used at least two specific supporting details, and included a meaningful, labeled visual.

I’m not a traditional test kind of guy. I would rather students create something that shows what they understand. With this assessment, they had to explain geography’s influence, compare city-states, describe cultural connections, and defend a choice about Greece’s lasting influence. There was plenty of thinking to do within one page.

Yes, They Could Use Their Notes

I allowed students to use their notes and the EduProtocols we completed throughout the unit. I want students to see that the things we do in class matter. The reading, writing, sketches, and discussions give them information they can use later. An assessment is a good opportunity to show them that connection.

I also want them to see that staying organized matters. Keeping their work, completing it thoughtfully, and knowing where to find it helps when it is time to create something with that information. Having notes available still leaves students with work to do. They have to choose relevant details, explain their thinking, and answer the question in their own words. For teachers considering this approach, let students use the work they have already created. It gives that work a purpose beyond the day it was completed.

A Strict Time Limit

Thursday’s class periods were shortened to 30 minutes, and Friday’s class was 45 minutes. Students had to submit the assessment by the end of class on Friday. They were not allowed to take it home. I told them, “If you know your stuff, you should be able to get this finished.” They had their notes, the work from our unit, clear directions, and a firm deadline.

A one-pager can take forever if students spend too much time on a title or one drawing. I wanted them to use their time to answer all four questions and create visuals that helped explain their answers. The time limit made it important to get started, stay focused, and make decisions about what to include.

Quality Matters

I also made it clear that this was an assessment. Quality mattered. Students needed accurate information, specific supporting details, complete explanations, and meaningful visuals. Their writing needed to be readable and in their own words.

I like giving students room to create, but they still need clear expectations. A colorful page needs thoughtful answers to go with it. For another teacher trying a one-pager, I would establish those expectations at the beginning. Students should know what a complete response looks like before they begin working.

Looking Back at the Week

I like how the work connected throughout the week. Students built background knowledge, analyzed sources, made claims, and used evidence in their writing. Then they used the work from our entire Ancient Greece unit to create their assessment.

That is what I want students to see. The things we do each day have a purpose. Their notes matter. Their organization matters. The information they learn gives them something to think about and something to create. By Friday, they had the opportunity to show what they could do with it.

Lessons for the Week

Monday – CyberSandwich Day 2

Tuesday – Sketch and Tell-o with Stake Your Claim

Wednesday – Sketch and Tell-o with Stake Your Claim

Thursday and Friday – One Pager

The Week That Was In 103

This week in 7th grade, we continued working our way through Ancient Greece. We started with the Golden Age of Athens and ended the week beginning our investigation of Alexander the Great. In between, students spent some time looking at just how much Ancient Greece still shows up in their lives today.

One thing I liked about this week was that we didn’t just learn about the achievements of Ancient Greece and move on. Students first learned about them through stations, then had to process what made the Golden Age “golden.” From there, they looked for those Greek influences in the modern world and decided which ones actually have the biggest impact on their own lives.

By Friday, we were ready to start asking a different kind of question. Instead of looking at what the Greeks created, we began looking at how Greek culture spread beyond Greece. That brought us to Alexander the Great.

Monday: Exploring the Golden Age of Athens

We started the week continuing our study of Ancient Greece by looking at the Golden Age of Athens. After the Persian Wars, Athens became wealthier and more powerful, and this period produced ideas and achievements that are still connected to Greece today. Rather than going through each achievement together, students worked through six different stations focused on different areas of Greek culture.

At each station, students read information, looked at examples, and answered questions. There was quite a bit of information to work through, so I wasn’t worried about everyone finishing in one day. I wanted students to have time to actually read and work with the information rather than race from station to station just to say they were finished.

The goal was to build a foundation. Before we could talk about the influence of Ancient Greece on our world today, students needed to understand what was actually happening during the Golden Age and what the Greeks were creating, thinking about, and doing differently.

Tuesday: Check It, Fix It, and Put It Together

Students started Tuesday by finishing any Golden Age stations they had left from Monday. Once everyone finished, I hung the answers to the stations around the room. Students took their papers, moved around the classroom, checked their responses, and made corrections. If something was wrong, they fixed it. If they were missing information, they added it.

I liked having students move around the room and check their own work instead of standing at the front and going through every answer together. They had to find the information, compare it to what they had written, and decide what needed to change. It also gave them another look at the information from all six stations before we asked them to do something with it.

Thick Slides: What Made the Golden Age Golden?

After checking their work, students created a Thick Slide to bring everything together. They used the information from their stations to share four facts about the Golden Age, add pictures that represented what they had learned, and respond to the bigger question: What made the Golden Age golden?

This was the piece I wanted after the stations. The stations gave students a lot of individual pieces of information, but the Thick Slide asked them to step back and make sense of all of it. Instead of just knowing that Athens had philosophers, impressive architecture, theater, art, and other achievements, they had to think about why all of those things together made this period significant.

It also gave us a good bridge into what we were going to do next. Students had spent two days learning about what came out of the Golden Age. Now we were ready to see where some of those ideas ended up.

Wednesday: Finding Ancient Greece in Our World

On Wednesday, we shifted from learning about the Golden Age to looking for Greek influence in the world around us. I handed students directions that contained the same six categories they had worked with during the stations. Instead of letting everyone immediately pick whatever topic they wanted, I had students roll a die. Whatever number they rolled determined the category they would work with.

Once students had their category, they still had some choice. They selected a Greek influence from that category and created an Iron Chef slide about it. I tried to make the choices a mixture of things students might expect and things they probably would not immediately connect to Ancient Greece. There were the more obvious connections, but there were also Disney movies, Percy Jackson, and local examples such as the Cincinnati Observatory.

Iron Chef: Greek Influence

Students used their topic to create one slide that taught the rest of the class about that Greek influence and its connection to our world today. The roll of the dice gave them some limits, but they still had choice within the category. More importantly, it kept everyone from choosing the same two or three topics.

I liked the shift from Tuesday to Wednesday. On Tuesday, students were answering What made the Golden Age golden? On Wednesday, they were starting to answer another question: Where can we still see it? By the end of class, we had a collection of student-created examples that we could use for the next day’s lesson.

Thursday: How Much Does Ancient Greece Affect You?

Before class on Thursday, I took all of the Iron Chef slides students had created and compiled them into one large slideshow. Instead of presenting the slides one at a time, students worked their way through the collection and looked at what their classmates had created.

The goal wasn’t to copy information from every slide. Students had already spent Wednesday researching one influence in more depth. Now I wanted them to see just how many different examples the class had found. As they worked through the slideshow, they saw Greek influence in everything from government and architecture to mythology, entertainment, sports, science, and places around Cincinnati.

Tier List: Greek Influence Today

We used a Tier List to process the slides, but I changed the question a little. I didn’t want students ranking which Greek contribution was the most historically important. Instead, I asked them to think about their own lives and rank the influences based on how much each one affects them today.

That made the activity much more personal. There wasn’t necessarily one correct Tier List. A student who reads Percy Jackson or watches movies connected to Greek mythology might rank mythology differently than someone else. Other students might recognize Greek influence in sports, government, architecture, or something they see around Cincinnati.

Students had spent the beginning of the week learning about Ancient Greece as history. By Thursday, they were looking at how much of that history is still sitting right in front of them.

Friday: Two Different Alexanders

Friday started with something new. I wanted students to learn Number Mania, but I didn’t want their first experience with the protocol to also require them to figure out a bunch of new history content. We started with a simple practice. Students had to take a slide and add two numbers, a title, and a picture. That gave them a chance to understand the basic structure before we used it with Alexander the Great.

Once they had the idea, we moved into Alexander. This time, however, students were not all given the same reading. Some students received a reading that presented Alexander in a positive way, focusing on his accomplishments, military success, empire, and the spread of Greek culture. Other students received a much more negative version that focused on the violence, destruction, and terror that came with his conquests.

The students didn’t know there were two different readings.

Number Mania Meets Archetypes

Students started creating their Number Mania slides using the Alexander they had been given. About halfway through, I decided to add another layer to the activity. I gave students a list of positive and negative archetypes and asked them to choose one that they thought fit Alexander based on their reading.

This is where things got interesting because they were confused.

Some students who had read the positive version of Alexander couldn’t understand why I had included so many negative archetypes. Students with the negative reading were looking at some of the positive choices wondering how those could possibly describe the guy they had just read about.

At first, I wasn’t sure how well adding the archetypes halfway through was going to work. The confusion actually ended up helping.

Teach Your Alexander

Students paired up and shared what they had learned about Alexander. As they started talking, they realized that they had not all been given the same version of the story. One student had learned about a successful military leader who created an enormous empire and helped spread Greek culture. The student sitting next to them might have learned about a conqueror who destroyed cities and used violence and fear to expand that same empire.

They were talking about the same person, but the stories didn’t sound the same.

That gave us the question we will continue with next week: Does Alexander deserve to be called “The Great”?

I could have started the lesson by putting that question on the board and telling students there were positive and negative ways to view Alexander. Instead, the different readings and archetypes allowed them to discover that problem on their own. The confusion over the archetypes actually became part of the lesson. Students had to talk to someone else before they understood why the choices they were seeing did not seem to match the Alexander they knew.

We ended the week with more questions about Alexander than we started with, which is probably a pretty good place to begin an inquiry.

Lessons For The Week

Monday – I can’t share the file, I don’t have permission.

Tuesday – Thick Slide

Wednesday – Iron Chef Slide, Directions

Thursday – Tier List

Friday – Alexander the Great Readings, Number Mania

The Week That Was In 103

This week in 103, we moved from examining Athenian democracy to exploring the Persian Wars and the Golden Age of Athens. We began by gathering evidence and developing an argument about whether Ancient Athens was truly democratic. From there, we used maps, readings, whiteboards, and sketches to understand the Persian Wars and how victory helped Athens grow stronger.

We finished the week with a scaffolded Research EduProtocol. Students gathered and shared facts about the Golden Age, ranked information from their classmates, and used that evidence to write. Throughout the week, each activity gave students something to work with in the next.

Monday: Building a Case About Athenian Democracy

I was absent on Monday, but students continued working with our question: Was Ancient Athens truly democratic? The previous Thursday and Friday, they had created a Thick Slide using evidence and information from Documents A and B. Monday’s lesson followed that same structure with two additional documents.

Thick Slides: Who Could Participate?

Document C was a table showing the percentages of citizens and noncitizens in Athens and who could participate in society. Document D was a secondary source about ostracism and its relationship to democracy. Together, these documents gave students more information to consider as they examined participation and power in Athens.

Students created a Thick Slide that included four to five facts from the documents, a comparison of the two sources, a picture they created, and a quote. The familiar format allowed them to continue the work we had started while adding evidence that could help them answer our larger question.

Stake Your Claim: Organizing the Evidence

I also left a Stake Your Claim EduProtocol. Students used their Thick Slides to develop a claim, select evidence, identify the document each piece of evidence came from, and explain their reasoning.

This moved students from gathering information to deciding what that information supported. They needed to explain how their evidence helped answer whether Ancient Athens was truly democratic.

By the end of the lesson, students had an organizer to build their written response from. Their Thick Slides held the information; Stake Your Claim helped them organize it into an argument.

Tuesday: Turning Evidence Into an Argument

I returned on Tuesday, and we began with Fast & Curious on Gimkit. I brought back the same Ancient Greece questions we had used two or three weeks earlier. Students did great! It was encouraging to see how much they remembered as we continued building on that earlier learning.

From Stake Your Claim to Scriblit

After our review, I reminded students of the Stake Your Claim organizer they had completed on Monday. Then we busted out Scriblit. Students used their organizers to write a formal claim, evidence, and reasoning response to our question: Was Ancient Athens truly democratic?

They already had a claim, evidence from the documents, and reasoning to work with. Now they needed to put those pieces together into a clear written response.

Checking the Claims

I gave students ten minutes to write and circulated as they worked. One thing I paid close attention to was how they started their claims. Were they beginning with “yes” or “no”? Were they using first-person language such as “I think” or “I believe”?

Those are two habits I want students to move away from in formal claims. I want them to answer the question directly and make a statement they can support with evidence. Circulating while they typed gave me a chance to offer that feedback while they were still working.

Battle Royale

Once the writing time ended, we ran a Battle Royale round with their responses. It was fun, and it gave us a different way to finish this part of our work on Athenian democracy.

Over the last few lessons, students had examined documents, gathered information in Thick Slides, organized an argument with Stake Your Claim, and written a formal response. Each step gave them something to use in the next.

And, in the interest of keeping this recap honest, we did something else that day, too. As I’m writing this, I cannot remember what it was. That’s the week it’s been.

Wednesday: Setting the Stage for the Persian Wars

After finishing our work on Athenian democracy, we turned our attention to the Persian Wars. This felt like a natural next step in our study of Greece. Understanding the conflict would help students see how Athens grew stronger and how the Greek victory helped set the stage for its Golden Age.

Wednesday’s class periods were shortened, so we focused on the geography and events that led to the war.

Map & Tell: Planning an Invasion

We began with a map and two questions. What challenges might the Persians face traveling from their empire to attack Athens? If students were leading the invasion, would they attack by land or by sea?

Students needed to use two details from the map to explain the challenges and support their choice of invasion route with geographic evidence. This brought us back to something we have returned to throughout the unit: geography shaped the choices people could make.

Sketch & Tell: How Did Athens Get Involved?

Next, students used a reading to sketch and label six stages leading into the Persian Wars. Breaking the background into stages gave them a way to follow the sequence and show how one event led to another.

They also answered the question: How did helping the Ionian rebels get Athens into a war with Persia? That explanation asked students to put the connection into words after representing it through their sketches.

Thursday: From the Persian Wars to the Golden Age

Thursday’s work moved us into the battles themselves. Students would first focus on one battle, then use their classmates’ work to piece together the larger story.

Iron Chef on the Whiteboards

Students read about their assigned battle and worked together to create a whiteboard that taught classmates what happened and why it mattered. Each board needed the battle’s name and year, a summary in their own words, a labeled sketch, and an explanation of its importance.

For the summary, we used Somebody, Wanted, But, So, Then. Who fought? What were they trying to accomplish? What obstacle did they face? What did they do? What was the result?

That structure gave students a way to organize the reading. Their labeled sketch showed an important moment or strategy, while the “Why it mattered” section asked for two to three sentences explaining how the battle affected what happened next.

Students also needed to write large and organize their boards so classmates could read them during the gallery walk. The boards were going to become a resource for the next part of the lesson.

Gallery Walk: Sketch & Tell, Comic Edition

Students used the whiteboards to retell the Persian Wars through sketches and captions. Their comic included Marathon, Thermopylae, Salamis, and Plataea, followed by a final panel focused on Athens.

Each battle needed a sketch and a caption. The Athens panel asked students to show how victory helped the city-state grow stronger. That final panel gave the battles a larger purpose and brought us toward our next topic: the Golden Age of Athens.

I like having students use what their classmates create. The whiteboard gave each group responsibility for explaining one part of the story, and the comic asked every student to put those parts together.

Wicked Hydra: A First Look at the Golden Age

We closed class with a Wicked Hydra to introduce the Golden Age of Athens. I had ChatGPT create an image representing the period and taped copies around the room.

Students had three minutes to write questions about what they noticed in the image. Then they rotated to a new board, read the questions already there, and added more of their own. We rotated again so students could continue building on their classmates’ questions.

The final panel of their Persian Wars comic asked how Athens grew stronger after the war. Now, the image gave them a chance to imagine what that stronger Athens might look like and ask questions about it. Those questions gave us a starting point for exploring the Golden Age.

Friday: What Made Athens’s Golden Age “Golden”?

On Friday, we dove into the Golden Age of Athens with a question: Why was 480–404 BCE considered the Golden Age for Athens? Thursday’s Wicked Hydra had given students a chance to ask questions about the period. Now we used a scaffolded version of the Research EduProtocol to gather information and develop an answer.

Research: Building a Shared Collection of Facts

In the Research EduProtocol, students investigate a question and crowdsource information to help answer it. They submit facts and their sources through a Google Form, with the responses feeding into a linked Google Sheet. That spreadsheet becomes a shared resource students can use in their writing.

For this round, I provided some support. I used ChatGPT to create seven articles drawing on seven different sources related to our question. Students received different articles and shared two facts from their assigned reading through the Google Form.

Then I sent them into the wild, wild west of the internet. Students did a Google search and submitted an additional fact, along with its source. The provided articles gave them a starting point before they searched on their own.

Tier List: Paraphrasing and Ranking

Once students submitted their facts, I shared the spreadsheet with everyone. They now had access to information gathered by the entire class.

I gave students a Tier List and ten minutes to paraphrase and rank six to seven facts from the shared collection. They needed to consider which facts would be most useful in explaining why this period was considered a golden age.

This step gave students time to work with the information before writing. They put facts into their own words and made decisions about which evidence would best help them answer the question.

Scriblit: Putting the Evidence to Work

Then we busted out Scriblit. Students had ten minutes to develop a paragraph answering our question, using at least two pieces of evidence.

Their Tier Lists gave them a place to start. They had already selected, paraphrased, and ranked information. Now they needed to use that evidence to explain what made the period a golden age for Athens.

The main sequence followed three ten-minute blocks: read and share two to three facts, paraphrase and rank, and develop a paragraph. That kept the work moving and gave each part a clear purpose.

We also fit in two rounds of Fast & Curious on Gimkit, with Golden Age questions added to our question set. Across the class period, students encountered the information, shared it, considered its value, and used it to write an answer.

Lessons for the Week

Monday – Thick Slide and Stake Your Claim

Wednesday and Thursday – Persian Wars Rack and Stack

Friday – Tier List

Thinking Too Much. Teaching Better with Less.

I think too much.

The last two years, I have thought too much. Maybe some of that came from being at two new schools in two years. New students, new content, new expectations. There’s a lot to figure out when you’re starting over, and apparently my response was to give myself even more to figure out.

I constantly felt like I needed to upgrade. Move the needle. Do something outside the box. Take a lesson that worked and find a way to make it better, bigger, or different.

I stressed myself out.

Somewhere along the way, “What do my students need to learn?” started sharing too much space with “What else could I do with this?” And I can spend a ridiculous amount of time answering that second question.

So this year, I’m back to basics.

Good, solid instruction. Good, solid EduProtocols that I know work. The EduProtocol Rack and Stacks that got me here in the first place. I’m paying more attention to why one activity follows another and giving students time to do something meaningful with each one.

I’m no longer trying to get through five, six, or seven protocols. There is no prize for fitting the most into 45 minutes. Although, knowing me, I probably would have tried to win it.

So far this year, I’ve introduced Fast & Curious, Thin Slides, Cyber Sandwich, Parafly, Frayer, Sketch & Tell-O, Thick Slides, and Hexagonal Thinking.

Do I need more? Probably not.

Will I introduce more? Yes. A few. I know myself.

But I want a reason for introducing them beyond having something new to try. There’s plenty of thinking students can do with the routines they already know. They can read something more challenging, make a stronger comparison, explain a connection, or go back and improve an answer. I don’t have to change the format every time I want to push their thinking.

That’s been my focus: teaching content through skills.

The content gives us something to think about. The protocols give students a familiar way to work with it. We’re practicing how to read, paraphrase, compare, explain, and support an idea while learning social studies. That’s plenty to work on.

I’m also letting go of the pressure to entertain. I’m done trying to smash EduProtocols together just because the combination might look cool. I still enjoy a creative lesson. I just don’t need every lesson to become a whole production.

And honestly? I’m more relaxed.

I’m grading about 90% of the work on the fly as students do it. I can see what they understand, ask a question, give feedback, and have them make an adjustment right there. That has felt manageable, and it keeps my attention on the work happening in front of me.

It’s been a good year so far. I’m enjoying teaching, and I’m finding that I can trust the routines I already know work.

I still think too much. But I’m getting better at looking at a solid lesson and letting it be enough.

The Week That Was In 103

This week in 103, we built on our work with Greek geography, city-states, and governments by taking a closer look at Athens and Sparta. Monday and Tuesday focused on how life differed between the two, with students moving from maps and partner readings to scenarios and writing about a day in the life of an Athenian, a Spartan, and themselves.

From there, exploring Athenian democracy felt like the natural next step. On Wednesday and Thursday, we worked through what democratic means, sketched the parts of Athens’s government, and began examining primary sources. Those activities gave students a foundation for considering the question that would guide our next few lessons: Was Ancient Athens truly democratic?

Monday: How Different Were Athens and Sparta?

After exploring Greek city-states and their governments, we turned our attention to Athens and Sparta. Both were Greek city-states, but daily life looked different depending on which one you called home.

Fast & Curious and Map & Tell

We started with Fast & Curious on Gimkit, followed by a Map & Tell to locate Athens and Sparta. Students used the map to predict which city-state relied more on sea trade and which relied more on farming. This brought us back to our earlier work with geography and how location could shape the way people lived.

CyberSandwich: Two Readings, One Comparison

Then we moved into CyberSandwich. I handed out two different readings, with one partner reading about Athens and the other reading about Sparta. Students read and took notes on their assigned city-state, looking at geography, government, education, and social life.

Partners then compared their notes. Each student brought different information to the conversation, so they needed to share what they had learned while gathering information about the other city-state. The categories helped organize that discussion and gave them specific points to compare.

Writing About Both City-States

From there, students wrote a summary using a compare-and-contrast text structure. Their notes and partner conversations gave them information about both places. Now they needed to organize those details into an explanation of how Athens and Sparta were alike and different.

I like giving the partner discussion a clear purpose. Students needed information from each other to complete the writing, and the comparison gave them a reason to look closely at both readings.

Tuesday: Putting the Details to Work

Monday gave students a foundation for comparing Athens and Sparta. On Tuesday, we returned to that information and asked students to apply it, first through scenarios and then through writing from different perspectives.

Fast & Curious and City-State Scenarios

We started with another round of Fast & Curious on Gimkit. Then, I used ChatGPT to create scenarios about life in each city-state. Students had to decide whether each scenario applied to Athens or Sparta and explain their reasoning.

The explanation mattered here. Students needed to connect details in the scenario to something they had learned about the city-state. That gave us another opportunity to revisit the differences in education, government, geography, and daily life.

3xPOV: A Day in the Life

We finished with a 3xPOV: a day in the life of an Athenian, a Spartan, and themselves. Students used details from their learning to describe life from each perspective.

Including themselves gave students a familiar point of comparison. They could consider their own schooling and daily routines alongside what they had learned about Athens and Sparta.

Across the two days, students kept working with the same information in different ways. They located the city-states, read about one, learned about the other from a partner, and wrote a comparison. The scenarios and 3xPOV then asked them to use those details to explain where a situation belonged and how someone’s daily life could change depending on where they lived.

Wednesday: Was Ancient Athens Truly Democratic?

After comparing Athens and Sparta, exploring Athenian democracy felt like the natural next step. I found a lesson from the Digital Inquiry Group (DIG) and drew some inspiration from Drew Skeeler. The question that would guide our next few days was: Was Ancient Athens truly democratic?

Before students could answer that, we needed to spend some time with the word democratic and learn more about how Athens’s government worked.

Fast & Curious and a Frayer

We started with Fast & Curious on Gimkit to build background knowledge about Athens and introduce vocabulary. Then, we “Frayered” the word democratic.

Students read a brief passage and used it to create a definition, identify examples and non-examples, and predict what a true democracy would look like. That last part gave us something to return to as we examined Athens. What would students expect to see in a democratic government, and how would Athens compare?

Building a Visual

Next, I showed a TED-Ed video about Athenian democracy. I wanted students to begin building a picture of the Assembly, the Council of 500, and the courts before we took a closer look at each one.

The Frayer gave us a starting point for thinking about democracy, and the video introduced the structures we would work with on Thursday.

Thursday: How Did Athenian Democracy Work?

On Thursday, we picked up with the parts of Athenian government students had seen in the video. Now they would read about each one and make decisions about how to represent it.

Sketch & Tell-O: What They Did and How They Were Chosen

We started with a Sketch & Tell-O focused on the Assembly. Students read about it, sketched what it did, and added a caption. Underneath that, they sketched how citizens became part of the Assembly and captioned that drawing, too. I put three minutes on the timer for the round.

Then we repeated the process with the Council of 500 and the courts. Each round asked students to consider the same two things: what that part of government did and how citizens became involved.

I like separating those questions because knowing a group’s job only tells us part of how a government works. Looking at how people become part of that group brings us back to who has access to power.

Two Documents, Two Views of Democracy

We finished class by reading two documents: one from Pericles and one from Aristotle’s Athenian Constitution. Students highlighted details that stood out to them and used the documents to create a Thick Slide.

The slide asked for two facts from each document related to democracy, a quote that stood out, and a comparison of how the two documents portrayed Athenian democracy. Students had to choose details from both sources and consider how those details fit together.

Our question carried through both days. We started by considering what democratic means, looked at how Athens’s government operated, and then began examining documents. Each step gave students more information to work with as they considered whether Ancient Athens was truly democratic.

Lessons for the Week

Monday – Athens vs. Sparta Rack and Stack

Wednesday – DIG Athens Lesson, Day 1 Rack and Stack

Thursday – Day 2 Rack and Stack

The Week That Was In 103

This week in 103, we built on our work with Greek geography to explore city-states and the governments that shaped them. Students moved from reading and discussing to whiteboards, writing, and gummy bear governments. MAP testing made the schedule a little unusual, but we kept connecting our learning around who held power and what it meant to be part of a Greek city-state.

Tuesday: What Makes a City-State More Than Just a City?

Tuesday picked up where we left off with Greek geography. Mountains and seas separated communities and helped lead to the growth of independent city-states. Now we needed to build on that with a question: What makes a city-state more than just a city?

Fast & Curious and a Frayer

We started with Fast & Curious on Gimkit to revisit previous learning, followed by a Frayer on citizen. This gave us a chance to look at both rights and responsibilities. Being a citizen meant belonging to a community, having a role in it, and being expected to contribute. We also looked at who had those political rights in Ancient Greece and who was left out.

CyberSandwich: Read and Take Notes

Then we moved into CyberSandwich. Students had 10 minutes to read and take notes, choosing five important facts that could help them answer our question. The reading went beyond the buildings and places within a polis to explore its government, laws, citizen-soldiers, and shared identity.

To the Boards: Choose the Top Three

For the partner discussion, students found whiteboard space, compared their notes, and ranked their top three facts before writing them on the board. I like giving that conversation a specific job. Partners had to decide which facts mattered most for answering the question and agree on what deserved a spot on their board.

Writing and a Battle Royale

From there, students used Scriblit to write their responses, and we ran a Battle Royale with their writing. The same question carried us through the lesson, from reading to partner discussion to writing. Each step gave students another opportunity to explain how a city-state functioned as an independent community and what held that community together.

Wednesday: Who Holds the Power?

Tuesday’s work on city-states gave us a place to start on Wednesday. Each polis had its own government, but those governments did not all operate the same way. We began with Fast & Curious on the four types we would be working with: democracy, oligarchy, tyranny, and monarchy.

Iron Chef on the Whiteboards

I handed out one of the four government readings to students, and they partnered up to create an Iron Chef whiteboard. Each pair had to explain who held power, how they gained it, how much influence ordinary citizens had, and one possible strength and weakness of that government. They also included a picture to represent it.

The secret ingredient was to explain how power worked in their government in exactly five words. That little constraint gave partners another decision to make. They had to choose words that captured the idea while staying within the limit.

Read the Room

Once the boards were ready, students received a Frayer divided into the four government types. They walked around the room, read each other’s boards, and recorded three important facts about each one. Partners had focused on one government for their Iron Chef, and the walk gave them a chance to learn about the other three.

The same ideas carried across all four: who gets to make decisions, how they get that power, and how much say everyone else has. Those questions would follow us into the next activity.

Thursday and Friday: Gummy Bear Governments

MAP testing made Thursday and Friday’s schedule a little weird, so we spread our next activity across both days. Students had read about the governments, created their boards, and gathered notes. Now I handed out gummy bears and asked them to show how each government worked.

Making Power Visible

Students arranged their gummy bears into scenes representing democracy, oligarchy, tyranny, and monarchy. They could use construction paper and props to help show who held power and how the other bears fit into the system.

This is where the differences mattered. Monarchy and tyranny both involve one ruler, so showing one bear in charge only tells part of the story. The scene and explanation needed to communicate how that ruler gained power. Democracy and oligarchy also needed to show a clear difference in who had a voice.

Explain the Scene

For each government, students were asked to include a photo, explain how the government worked, and identify one positive and one negative. They also explained what was happening in their gummy bear scene so the arrangement connected to the content.

I like this progression because students keep working with the same information in different ways. They read it, choose what matters, learn from each other’s boards, and then make decisions about how to represent it. The gummy bears give them something to build with, but the explanation is where they have to connect that construction to their understanding of government.

Lessons for the Week

Tuesday – City States Rack and Stack, Reading

Wednesday – Governments Rack and Stack (Frayer with Mr. Roughton Template), Reading

Taking CyberSandwich to the Boards

I like a protocol I can run again without spending half the class explaining the directions. CyberSandwich is one of those. Students read and take notes, compare with a partner, and then write. Simple structure. Plenty of room for thinking. But I wanted to change up the middle.

How I Run CyberSandwich

Here’s how I typically run it. Students get about 10 minutes to read and take notes. I keep the reading to about a page or a page and a half. Enough to give them something to work with, but manageable for the time they have.

The notes can look different depending on the reading and the students. Sometimes I ask for five important facts that will help them answer our question. Sometimes I scaffold the notes with questions. Sometimes a graphic organizer makes sense because it matches the structure of the text. Make the note-taking fit your students and your class. They need something useful to bring to the conversation and eventually use in their writing.

The second part is comparing notes with a partner. What did you write down? What did I catch that you missed? What do we have in common? This is such an important part of the process because students get to talk through what they read before responding on their own.

Then they spend about 10 minutes writing a response to the prompt or question. Mine might write in Scriblit, on paper, or in a Google Doc or Slide. Again, whatever works. The platform can change. They still need to answer the question and support their thinking.

Changing the Middle

Here’s where I switched things up. I’ve always valued the partner discussion, but having students rewrite facts they had just written down felt a little repetitive. I wanted to give them a reason to talk through their choices. So I borrowed a piece from Building Thinking Classrooms.

Students partner up, stand up, and head to a whiteboard with their notes. Their job is to discuss what they collected and create a Top 3 or Top 5 list of facts that best help answer our question. That last part matters. A fact might be interesting, but does it help answer what we’re asking?

Now they have a decision to make together. If both students bring five facts, everything might not make the board. They have to compare, explain their choices, and decide what belongs. Which facts overlap? Which ones give them the strongest evidence? Is there something their partner found that they should include? It gives the discussion a purpose and something to produce.

I also like that it gets students up and moving during the lesson. They’ve spent time reading and taking notes independently. Now they’re standing beside a partner, talking through the reading, and making their thinking visible.

A Room Full of Evidence

And when it’s time to write, the facts stay up. Students are surrounded by everyone’s Top 3 or Top 5. They can look around the room and pull from what other pairs thought was important. Maybe another group noticed something they missed. Maybe seeing a fact on the board reminds them of a detail they can use. They still write their own response, but now they have their notes, their partner conversation, and a room full of evidence to help them.

It’s a small change, and that’s part of why I like it. CyberSandwich still follows the same sequence: read and take notes, compare and discuss, then write. I’ve just given that middle piece a little more movement and a clearer job. Get up. Talk it through. Decide what matters. Then use it.